Template:Did you know nominations/St. Paul's Episcopal Church (Chattanooga, Tennessee)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 12:01, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
St. Paul's Episcopal Church (Chattanooga, Tennessee)
[edit]( )
- ... that St. Paul's Episcopal Church (pictured) was described as Georgian on the outside, but "much more Gothic and much more Victorian" on the inside?
- ALT1:... that St. Paul's Episcopal Church (pictured) in Chattanooga has a homeless shelter in its undercroft?
- Reviewed: Musca
5x expanded by Orlady (talk). Nominated by Orlady (talk) at 03:15, 20 February 2014 (UTC).
5x expanded, long enough and hooks with citation. QPQ is done and image is free. But this link does not support the facts in the article, please add appropriate link to the article. --Gfosankar (talk) 07:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- The link that Gfosankar finds inadequate is a link to the National Park Service website where the National Register Information System (NRIS) database is available for download. The database itself cannot be accessed via a web interface on the Park Service website, but the information can be verified from the database (you can think of it as if it were a citation to a printed book). Various non-WP:RS websites, including http://nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com have web interfaces to the data. Wikipedia user Elkman maintains interfaces to the data (for use by Wikipedia contributors) on his own website at http://www2.elkman.net/nrhp/ . Note that the NRIS database is not a source for either of the proposed hook facts. --Orlady (talk) 17:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Somebody needs to revisit this... --Orlady (talk) 05:53, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- nice visit, thanks for the invitation. I think ALT1 is more unusual and attractive! For this month, how about including "women and children"? Please you do it, if you like it ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:54, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- I appreciate opinions about the hooks. It appears that Gfosankar OKed almost everything about this nomination; his only concern was that the reference citation to "National Register Information System" includes a URL for a page that does not actually provide details about this church (instead, it is a page that explains how to obtain the NRIS database). I explained that URL (which appears in reference citations in well over 10,000 Wikipedia articles) above. Someone needs to review that one item. --Orlady (talk) 15:56, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry that I didn't mention that I accept the source AGF, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:49, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- The link that Gfosankar finds inadequate is a link to the National Park Service website where the National Register Information System (NRIS) database is available for download. The database itself cannot be accessed via a web interface on the Park Service website, but the information can be verified from the database (you can think of it as if it were a citation to a printed book). Various non-WP:RS websites, including http://nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com have web interfaces to the data. Wikipedia user Elkman maintains interfaces to the data (for use by Wikipedia contributors) on his own website at http://www2.elkman.net/nrhp/ . Note that the NRIS database is not a source for either of the proposed hook facts. --Orlady (talk) 17:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Just to summarise and make very clear after thanking all those above. All the points are ticked. Please leave this alone now. Let it go out out into main space and meet some readers. Victuallers (talk) 19:33, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
